ASTR 101 ยท Lecture 13

Cosmology and the Large-Scale Universe

Evidence, model, and quantitative reasoning

Learning Goals

  1. Explain why this lecture's central phenomenon matters: on the largest scales, galaxies trace an expanding universe with a measurable history, composition, and structure.
  2. Use the key model idea that expansion relates redshift and distance, but recession is not ordinary motion through static space.
  3. Apply the lecture's quantitative tool with units, assumptions, and a physical interpretation.
  4. Correct the misconception: The universe does not have a center in the simple expanding-space model; every distant observer sees large-scale expansion.

Reading anchor: OpenStax Astronomy 2e, Chapter 29.1-29.6 on redshift, expansion, the Hubble law, cosmic background radiation, and cosmological evidence.

Why This Question Matters

Slipher's redshifts, Hubble and Lemaitre's expansion interpretation, and the discovery of the cosmic microwave background transformed cosmology from speculation into measurement.

Opening Phenomenon

On the largest scales, galaxies trace an expanding universe with a measurable history, composition, and structure.

First question: what is directly observed, and what part is an explanation built from a model?

Terms for This Lecture

expansion

Definition: The time-dependent increase of distances between sufficiently separated, unbound cosmic locations as described by the changing cosmological scale factor.

Why it matters here: It organizes the redshift-distance relation and the thermal history of the universe.

Relationships: The Hubble parameter is \(\dot a/a\); redshift links observed wavelength to the scale factor at emission.

Boundary or common confusion: Expansion does not make bound systems such as atoms, people, or the solar system grow.

\[ H(t)=\frac{\dot a}{a} \]

Evidence We Need to Explain

Physical or Geometric Model

Quantitative Tool

\[ v = H_0 d \]

Use the Hubble law as a low-redshift linear model and look for scatter from peculiar motion and uncertainty.

Worked Example

  1. Using H0 = 70 km/s/Mpc, a galaxy at 100 Mpc has approximate recession speed 7000 km/s.
  2. This low-redshift calculation is a first model, not a complete distance-redshift relation.
  3. Uncertainty in distance and peculiar velocity affects the inference.

The answer should state that the calculation is an approximation and name one source of scatter.

Visual Reasoning

Connect redshift, distance, expansion, and model limits; identify where simple Hubble-law reasoning stops.

  • What does the slope represent?
  • Where would peculiar velocities add scatter?
  • Why is this only a low-redshift approximation?
OpenStax Hubble law plot of recession velocity versus distance.
The slope of recession velocity versus distance is the Hubble constant; the historical data also show scatter and calibration limits. Credit: OpenStax Astronomy 2e, Fig. 26.15, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; adapted from Hubble and Humason data.

Common Misconception

The universe does not have a center in the simple expanding-space model; every distant observer sees large-scale expansion.

Correct it by focusing on expansion of space and the absence of a privileged center.

Active Learning Segment

Students interpret a redshift-distance plot and identify scatter, slope, outliers, and model limitations.

Write a prediction first, compare reasoning with a neighbor, then revise your answer in one sentence.

Lab or Observing Connection

The analysis activity uses redshift-distance data and discusses limits of simple Hubble-law reasoning. Your redshift-distance analysis should identify slope, scatter, and limits of the simple model.

Synthesis

Cosmology is evidence synthesis at scale: redshift, background radiation, element abundances, and structure must agree.

References and Visual Credits