1. Impact Energy and Hazard Scaling 25 points
A stony asteroid has diameter 80 m, density \(3000\,\mathrm{kg\ m^{-3}}\), and impact speed \(20\,\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}\). Treat it as a sphere and use \(E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2\).
- Compute its mass.
- Compute its kinetic energy in joules.
- Convert to megatons of TNT using \(1\,\mathrm{Mt}=4.184\times10^{15}\) J.
- If speed doubles while diameter and density stay fixed, by what factor does energy change?
Deliverables: mass, energy, TNT equivalent, and scaling explanation.
2. Comet Orbit and Activity Window 25 points
A comet has perihelion 1.2 AU and aphelion 35 AU.
- Compute the semimajor axis.
- Use \(P^2=a^3\) to estimate the orbital period in years.
- Explain why activity increases near perihelion.
- State two ways a comet nucleus differs from an asteroid of similar size, and one observational ambiguity.
Deliverables: orbit calculation and composition/activity interpretation.
3. Transit Depths and Planet Radii 25 points
Use \(\delta=(R_p/R_*)^2\). Assume a Sun-like star with \(R_*=1.00R_\odot\), \(R_J=0.100R_\odot\), and \(R_E=0.00916R_\odot\).
- Compute the transit depth for a Jupiter-size planet.
- Compute the transit depth for an Earth-size planet in parts per million.
- A transit survey has single-transit precision of 200 ppm. Which planet is easier to detect and why?
- Explain one geometric and one instrumental bias of the transit method.
Deliverables: depth calculations and detection-bias paragraph.
4. Solar-System Expectations versus Exoplanet Architecture 25 points
A discovered system has three planets: Planet b, period 3.0 d and radius \(1.8R_E\); Planet c, period 8.5 d and radius \(2.7R_E\); Planet d, period 31 d and radius \(3.5R_E\). The star is Sun-like.
- Use \(a=P^{2/3}\) with \(P\) in years to estimate each semimajor axis in AU.
- Compare the architecture with the solar system's inner rocky planets and outer giants.
- Explain why this system might have been easier to discover than a true solar-system analog.
- State one formation or migration hypothesis that could account for close-in sub-Neptunes.
Deliverables: semimajor-axis table and comparative interpretation.