ASTR 210 · Lecture 09

Radial Velocity and Redshift

Velocity from calibrated wavelength shifts

Learning Goals

  1. Apply the non-relativistic Doppler formula to measure radial velocity from a wavelength shift.
  2. Cross-check a velocity measurement using multiple independent spectral lines.
  3. Explain why line blends or calibration drift can masquerade as a velocity signal.

Reading anchor: OpenStax Astronomy 2e, Chapter 5.6 (the Doppler effect).

Why This Matters

The Doppler shift is one of the most productive tools in observational astronomy: it reveals orbital motion in binary stars, radial velocities in exoplanet detection, and cosmological redshift in distant galaxies. Its reliability depends entirely on the wavelength calibration developed in the previous lecture.

Opening Phenomenon

Three lines in the same spectrum — Hα, Hβ, and [O III] — are all shifted redward of their laboratory wavelengths. If the shift is a genuine bulk radial velocity, all three lines should imply the same velocity.

First question: what here is directly measured, and what is inferred from a model?

Terms for This Lecture

rest wavelength

Definition: The laboratory or source-frame wavelength assigned to a spectral transition before Doppler shifting.

Why it matters here: It is the reference \(\lambda_0\) against which an observed displacement is converted to velocity or redshift.

Relationships: The measured shift is \(\Delta\lambda=\lambda_{obs}-\lambda_0\), entering \(v/c\approx\Delta\lambda/\lambda_0\) at low speed.

Boundary / common confusion: Air and vacuum wavelength conventions differ slightly, so the convention must match the calibration.

Evidence We Need to Explain

Model

Quantitative Tool

\[ \dfrac{v}{c} \approx \dfrac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda_0} \]

Worked Example

  1. Hα: Δλ = 0.60 nm, λ₀ = 656.3 nm, v = (0.60/656.3)×299792 km/s = 274.1 km/s.
  2. Hβ: Δλ = 0.45 nm, λ₀ = 486.1 nm, v = (0.45/486.1)×299792 km/s = 277.5 km/s.
  3. [O III]: Δλ = 0.46 nm, λ₀ = 500.7 nm, v = (0.46/500.7)×299792 km/s = 275.4 km/s.
  4. All three independent lines agree to within about 1.9 km/s of the mean, v ≈ 275.7 km/s — strong evidence for a genuine, single bulk radial velocity rather than a line-specific artifact.

Visual Reasoning

Compare the three independent line shifts.

  • Why does agreement across Hα, Hβ, and [O III] strengthen the case for a real bulk velocity?
  • What pattern would you expect if one line were contaminated by a blend?
Lecture 09: Radial Velocity and Redshiftwavelength (nm)Hαv=274 km/sHβv=278 km/s[O III]v=275 km/sgray tick = rest wavelength; gold tick = observed wavelengthThree unrelated lines (Hα, Hβ, [O III]) all shift redward and agree on v≈275.7 km/s -- evidence of one genuine bulk velocity, not a line-specific artifact.
Rest and observed positions for three independent lines, with each implied velocity labeled.

Common Pitfall

Ascribing an observed wavelength shift to physical velocity without checking for calibration drift, line blending with a neighboring feature, or an error in identifying which transition produced the line.

Active Learning Segment

Given a fourth line with rest wavelength 434.0 nm, predict its observed wavelength if the source has the same radial velocity found above, then discuss what a large discrepancy from that prediction would suggest.

Lab or Observing Connection

Lab 06 continues into a multi-line radial-velocity determination using the wavelength solution derived earlier in the same lab.

Synthesis

Velocity comes from calibrated wavelength shifts confirmed across multiple lines, not from the visual appearance of a single shifted feature.

References