ASTR 230 · Lecture 09

Black Holes and Curved Spacetime

When even degeneracy pressure is not enough

Learning Goals

  1. Compute the Schwarzschild radius for a given mass and explain its physical meaning as an event horizon.
  2. Explain why black holes form when a collapsing core exceeds the maximum mass supportable by neutron degeneracy pressure.
  3. Describe two independent lines of observational evidence for black holes.

Reading anchor: OpenStax Astronomy 2e, Chapter 24.1-24.3 (introduction to relativity and time dilation, spacetime, black holes and their observation).

Why This Matters

Neutron degeneracy pressure, like electron degeneracy pressure, has a maximum mass it can support (roughly 2-3 M☉ for neutron stars). Beyond that mass, physics as currently understood allows no known force to halt gravitational collapse, leading to a black hole — once a theoretical curiosity of general relativity, now directly imaged (Event Horizon Telescope, 2019) and detected via gravitational waves from merging black holes (LIGO/Virgo, since 2015).

Opening Phenomenon

The Event Horizon Telescope’s 2019 image of the supermassive black hole in M87 directly showed a dark central shadow surrounded by a bright ring of glowing gas, matching general-relativistic predictions for a black hole’s event horizon and photon ring to within observational precision.

First question: what here is directly observed, and what is inferred from a physical model?

Terms for This Lecture

Schwarzschild radius

Definition: The Schwarzschild radius R_s = 2GM/c² gives the event horizon radius for a non-rotating black hole of mass M; it scales linearly with mass, so more massive black holes have larger (not smaller) event horizons.

Why it matters here: Black holes are the endpoint of collapse for cores too massive for neutron degeneracy pressure to support, with an event horizon size (Schwarzschild radius) that scales linearly with mass and is now directly probed by gravitational-wave and imaging observations.

Relationship: Black holes are the endpoint of collapse for cores too massive for neutron degeneracy pressure to support, with an event horizon size (Schwarzschild radius) that scales linearly with mass and is now directly probed by gravitational-wave and imaging observations.

Boundary or common confusion: Imagining a black hole as a "cosmic vacuum cleaner" that pulls in everything nearby with unusually strong gravity. Outside the event horizon, a black hole’s gravity is identical to that of any other object of the same mass; a Sun-mass black hole at the Sun’s current distance would not pull Earth in any harder than the Sun already does.

Evidence We Need to Explain

Model

Quantitative Tool

\[ R_s = \dfrac{2GM}{c^{2}} \]

Worked Example

  1. For a 10 M☉ stellar-mass black hole: M = 10 × 1.989e+30 kg = 1.989e+31 kg.
  2. R_s = 2 × 6.674e-11 × 1.989e+31 / (2.998e+08)² = 29538.5 m ≈ 29.5 km.
  3. For the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (mass ≈ 4.3 × 10⁶ M☉): R_s = 2 × 6.674e-11 × (4.3e6 × 1.989e+30) / (2.998e+08)² ≈ 1.27e+07 km — roughly 430000 times larger than the 10 M☉ case, directly illustrating that R_s scales linearly with mass.

Visual Reasoning

Study this lecture’s figure, built from the same numbers used in the worked example above.

  • What quantity is plotted, measured, or compared, and over what range?
  • What trend, shape, or contrast in the figure carries the physical argument?
  • What would change in the figure if the underlying assumption or data point were different?
Lecture 09: Black HolesEvent-horizon size scales linearly with massmass (M☉, log scale)Schwarzschild radius R_s (km, log scale)10 M☉ stellar black hole: R_s≈2.95e+01 kmSagittarius A*: R_s≈1.27e+07 kmR_s = 2GM/c² is a straight line on log-log axes: more massive black holes have larger, not smaller, event horizons.
Lecture 09 figure: Black Holes and Curved Spacetime.

Common Misconception

Imagining a black hole as a "cosmic vacuum cleaner" that pulls in everything nearby with unusually strong gravity. Outside the event horizon, a black hole’s gravity is identical to that of any other object of the same mass; a Sun-mass black hole at the Sun’s current distance would not pull Earth in any harder than the Sun already does.

Active Learning Segment

Compute the Schwarzschild radius for Earth’s mass (5.97 × 10²⁴ kg) and compare it to Earth’s actual radius, to see why Earth is nowhere close to being a black hole.

Lab Connection

Lab 05 extends this gravitational reasoning (v²R/G mass estimates) to the Milky Way’s rotation curve, using the same Newtonian gravity that gives the weak-field limit of the black hole physics developed here.

Synthesis

Black holes are the endpoint of collapse for cores too massive for neutron degeneracy pressure to support, with an event horizon size (Schwarzschild radius) that scales linearly with mass and is now directly probed by gravitational-wave and imaging observations.

References