Apparatus and Setup
This is a data-analysis lab using real, precisely measured stellar parameters for the Sun and for Alpha Centauri A and B (live-verified this session via a direct fetch of the Alpha Centauri system's measured orbital and stellar parameters, citing Akeson et al. 2021, AJ 162, 14; see ../reference-log.md for full provenance). No telescope time is required; the lab reproduces, from first principles, the Stefan-Boltzmann and Wien's-law cross-checks introduced in Lecture 02.
Materials and Data
| Star | T_eff (K) | R (R⊙) | Measured L (L⊙) | Spectral type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | 5778 | 1.000 | 1.000 | G2V |
| Alpha Centauri A (Rigil Kentaurus) | 5748 | 1.223 | 1.5059 | G2V |
| Alpha Centauri B (Toliman) | 5154 | 0.864 | 0.4981 | K1V |
Procedure
- For each of the three stars, compute the Wien's-law peak wavelength λ_max = b/T_eff using b = 2.8971e-03 m·K, and identify which part of the electromagnetic spectrum each peak falls in.
- For each star, compute the Stefan-Boltzmann luminosity L = 4πR²σT⁴ from its measured radius and temperature (convert R to meters and T to kelvin first), then convert the result to solar luminosities.
- Compare each star's Stefan-Boltzmann luminosity to its independently measured (asteroseismic/interferometric) luminosity from the data table, and compute the percent agreement for each star.
- Rank the three stars by T_eff, by radius, and by Stefan-Boltzmann luminosity, and explain in one paragraph why Alpha Centauri B is both cooler and smaller than the Sun yet not simply proportionally less luminous (i.e., discuss how L depends on both R and T, not R or T alone).
- Propagate a plausible ±1% uncertainty in each star's measured radius through the Stefan-Boltzmann formula (noting L ∝ R², so a fractional radius uncertainty is doubled in the resulting fractional luminosity uncertainty) and state whether this uncertainty alone could explain the percent agreement found in step 3.
Analysis and Uncertainty
Because L ∝ R²T⁴, the fractional uncertainty in a Stefan-Boltzmann luminosity estimate is approximately 2×(fractional radius uncertainty) + 4×(fractional temperature uncertainty) added in quadrature; the T⁴ dependence means that even a small temperature uncertainty can dominate the total luminosity uncertainty budget.
Deliverables
- Completed Wien's-law and Stefan-Boltzmann tables for all three stars, with full unit conversions shown.
- Percent-agreement calculation between the Stefan-Boltzmann and measured luminosity for each star.
- Written comparison paragraph addressing the R²T⁴ dependence.
- Uncertainty-propagation estimate and a one-paragraph judgment of whether measurement uncertainty alone explains the observed agreement.
Assessment Criteria
- Correct unit conversions (R⊙ to m, T_eff already in K) before applying the Stefan-Boltzmann formula.
- Correct percent-agreement arithmetic for all three stars.
- Written comparison correctly explains the R²T⁴ scaling rather than attributing luminosity differences to radius or temperature alone.
- Uncertainty propagation correctly applies the doubled/quadrupled fractional-uncertainty scaling for R and T respectively.
References and Provenance
- OpenStax Astronomy 2e (local reference copy: references/openstax-astronomy-2e-extracted.txt), Chapter 5.4 and Chapter 18.1.
- Alpha Centauri A/B parameters: live-verified this session (Wikipedia "Alpha Centauri," citing Akeson et al. 2021, AJ 162, 14); see
materials/ASTR310/reference-log.md. - Generated by
materials/ASTR310/src/generate_astr310_content.py.