Lab 04: Weighing Alpha Centauri AB with Kepler’s Third Law

Determine the total mass of a real binary star system from its measured orbit alone, and compare escape velocities across five real objects.

Apparatus and Setup

This lab reproduces, with full unit-conversion detail, the Alpha Centauri AB total-mass determination from Lecture 08 and the shell-theorem/escape-velocity comparisons from Lecture 07, using the live-verified orbital elements and stellar parameters in ../data/alpha_centauri_orbit.csv and ../data/alpha_centauri_ab.csv.

Materials and Data

QuantityValue
Orbital period P79.762 yr
Semimajor axis a23.299 AU
Eccentricity e0.51947
Alpha Centauri A (Rigil Kentaurus) measured mass1.0788 M⊙
Alpha Centauri B (Toliman) measured mass0.9092 M⊙

Procedure

  1. Convert P to seconds and a to meters, then apply the generalized Kepler's third law, (m1+m2) = 4π²a³/(GP²), to obtain the total system mass in kilograms, then convert to solar masses.
  2. Compare your Kepler-derived total mass to the independently measured sum of the two stars' masses, and compute the percent agreement.
  3. Compute the surface escape velocity for Alpha Centauri A and for Alpha Centauri B using their measured masses and radii, and compare both to Earth's and the Sun's escape velocities (also compute these) and to Sirius B's escape velocity (a white dwarf, carried forward from ASTR230; data given in the lecture).
  4. Rank all five objects (Earth, Sun, Alpha Centauri A, Alpha Centauri B, Sirius B) by escape velocity, and explain in one paragraph why Sirius B's escape velocity is so much higher despite its unremarkable mass, tying the explanation explicitly to the 1/√R dependence in the escape-velocity formula.

Analysis and Uncertainty

The published semimajor axis (17.493 ± 0.0096 arcsec, converted using the measured parallax) and period (79.762 ± 0.019 yr) both carry small formal uncertainties; propagate the semimajor-axis uncertainty alone through Kepler's third law (noting the total mass scales as a³, so a fractional semimajor-axis uncertainty is tripled in the resulting fractional mass uncertainty) and compare the resulting mass uncertainty to the percent agreement found in step 2.

Deliverables

Assessment Criteria

References and Provenance