Problem Set 06: Solution Key

Strehl Ratio Trade-offs for a New AO System

Worked Solutions

1. Strehl ratios

S_K = exp[-(2π×100/2200)²] = 0.922; S_J = exp[-(2π×100/1250)²] = 0.777.

CriterionPoints
Correct K-band arithmetic10
Correct J-band arithmetic10

2. Comparison

Improvement factor = 0.922/0.812 = 1.14× higher Strehl ratio at K band with the upgraded system.

CriterionPoints
Correct ratio arithmetic8
Correct interpretation7

3. Wavefront-error budget

If three equal independent terms combine as √(3σ_i²) to go from 160 nm to 100 nm in quadrature difference, then σ_i = √[(160²-100²)/3] ≈ 72 nm per independent upgrade (an illustrative decomposition, not a claim about any specific real upgrade's exact contribution).

CriterionPoints
Correct RSS-difference algebra10
Correct final per-term value5

4. Science case justification

High-contrast J-band imaging benefits strongly from the proposed upgrade because Strehl ratio rises steeply with decreasing wavefront error at shorter wavelengths (S_J=0.777 versus a much lower current-system J-band Strehl); a higher Strehl ratio concentrates more light into the diffraction-limited core rather than a broad halo, directly improving the contrast needed to detect faint companions close to a bright host star.

CriterionPoints
Correct quantitative grounding in the computed Strehl values12
Correct physical connection to high-contrast imaging8

Grading Notes

Award full marks for correct method, units, and a numeric result consistent with the arithmetic shown (allow reasonable rounding). Verify that the student re-derives the number for this problem's specific inputs rather than quoting a lecture example without adaptation. Watch specifically for unit-conversion errors (arcsec/radian, nm/m, mm/m) and for comparative-magnitude or comparative-resolution statements given in the wrong direction (e.g., "finer" versus "coarser" resolution, or "more" versus "less" light-gathering power) -- these are the most common sources of order-of-magnitude mistakes in this course.