Lab 07: Capstone: Geomagnetically Induced Currents and the Full Flare-to-Grid Chain

Estimate GIC risk scaling from the real Carrington-era field-change rate and synthesize this course's full seven-unit case study chain.

Apparatus and Setup

This capstone lab estimates a representative geomagnetically induced current (GIC)-driving geoelectric field from a specified rate of magnetic-field change (Lecture 14), and synthesizes this course's full flare-to-grid physical chain using the real 6 September 2017 event and the Carrington Event as bracketing case studies.

Materials and Data

2024 Beggan et al. reanalysis (live-verified this session): Carrington-era field-change rate >700 nT/minute, exceeding the modern 1-in-100-year extreme value of 350-400 nT/minute at the same latitude. A simplified geoelectric-field estimate uses a uniform-half-space approximation, E ∝ sqrt(dB/dt) for a given ground conductivity (a standard, simplified space-weather-engineering approximation; level 3 for this course's specific numeric ground-conductivity choice, disclosed in ../reference-log.md).

Procedure

  1. Compute the ratio of the Carrington-era field-change rate (using the reported >700 nT/min value) to the modern 1-in-100-year extreme value, and state this ratio as a measure of how anomalous the 1859 event's rate of change was, independent of its Dst magnitude.
  2. Using the simplified E ∝ sqrt(dB/dt) scaling, compute the factor by which the induced geoelectric field (and hence GIC magnitude, which scales linearly with the geoelectric field in a simple resistive-line model) would increase for the Carrington-era rate of change relative to the modern extreme-value benchmark.
  3. Tabulate this course's full seven-unit case-study chain for the real 6 September 2017 event: one specific real numeric quantity from each unit (structure/atmosphere, magnetism/sunspots, flares, CME/solar wind, missions, magnetosphere/Dst, and technological impact).
  4. Identify, from your own tabulated chain, which single quantity is level 1 (live-verified this session), which are level 2 (standard published, not re-verified), and which (if any) are level 3 (order-of-magnitude/illustrative), and confirm this matches ../reference-log.md's disclosure.

Analysis and Uncertainty

Discuss why GIC risk assessment cannot rely on Dst magnitude alone (Lecture 14's central point) and why the Beggan et al. (2024) dB/dt reanalysis is a genuinely distinct, additional piece of evidence for Carrington-level risk, not merely a restatement of the already-known large Dst estimate.

Deliverables

Assessment Criteria

References and Provenance