ASTR 410 · Lecture 13

Lecture 13: Galactic Archaeology and the Milky Way in Time

Galactic Astronomy

A galaxy is not only a present-day equilibrium: disrupted satellites and chemically tagged stars preserve its assembly record.

Objectives and route

Why this question is hard

A galaxy is not only a present-day equilibrium: disrupted satellites and chemically tagged stars preserve its assembly record.

Galactic astronomy observes projected light, velocities, and abundances from one moving vantage point. The inverse problem is underdetermined until geometry, selection, and a physical model are made explicit.

bulgediskhalo
Stellar Stream: a lecture-specific schematic or model plot. Axes and annotations identify the inference being made; it is not presented as a raw survey image.

Terms for This Lecture

Stellar stream

Definition: A coherent, elongated structure of stars stripped from a cluster or dwarf galaxy along its orbit.

Why it matters here: Streams preserve phase-space evidence of accretion and probe the Galactic potential.

Relationship: Their track, distance, velocities, and width are compared with orbit or disruption models.

Limitation or common confusion: A stream is not exactly one orbit because stripping occurs over time and stars have finite dispersion.

Physical tool

The central relation for this lecture is:

\(t_{\rm lookback}=t_0-t_{\rm formation}\)

Define every symbol before substitution. State the coordinate system, units, and approximation. A formula is evidence only when its assumptions match the tracer and regime.

Evidence display

The evidence display for this lecture is the labeled model/data relationship introduced above. Read the axes and annotations before accepting the inferred trend.

Data context: the accompanying values are standard published or survey-like values; see the course reference log for provenance level and spot-check targets.

Worked calculation

The synthesis retains the local enclosed mass 1.0262e+11 solar masses as a cross-check across dynamics and populations.

The conclusion is strongest when independent tracers agree rather than when one model fits one plot.

Write the units beside each intermediate quantity. The numerical result is generated from the shared course constants and recomputed independently during review.

Interpret the pattern

Boundary condition and misconception

Do not overread the model: Chemical tagging is probabilistic; migration and selection can blur the original birth environment.

Ask whether changing the distance prior, selection function, or mass decomposition could move the conclusion. This is where a plausible diagram can become a misleading argument.

In-class reasoning

Prompt: Compare a metal-poor stream ([Fe/H]=-1.5) with a thin-disk sample ([Fe/H]=-0.05) using the abundance-ratio function.

First estimate the direction of the answer. Then calculate. Finally name one assumption that could reverse the interpretation.

Connection across the course

Takeaways

References and data status

OpenStax Astronomy 2e, Chapter 25, sections 25.1–25.4, and Chapter 26 for comparative context. Exact section and embedded-figure offsets were checked against the local extracted text before release.

Additional sources: Gaia Collaboration (2018, 2021) releases; Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard (2016), ARA&A 54, 529; McMillan (2017), MNRAS 465, 76; Eilers et al. (2019), ApJ 871, 120; Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2019), Science 365, 859.

References are standard published values not independently re-fetched in this production session unless explicitly marked level 1 in reference-log.md.