Lecture 07: Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cosmic Shear

ASTR 476: Observational Cosmology · 2026-09-27

Driving question: How can tiny image distortions reveal matter?

Learning objectives

  1. Relate tangential shear to projected mass contrast and lens-source geometry.
  2. Define Sigma_crit and identify the redshift dependence.
  3. Explain the purpose and nuisance structure of a 3x2pt analysis.
Terms · 8 min

Terms for This Lecture

Weak lensing

Definition: Small coherent distortions of background images produced by foreground gravitational potentials.

Why it matters here: It is required to answer How can tiny image distortions reveal matter? and to distinguish direct observation from cosmological inference.

Relationships: Read it with Cosmic shear, the model \(gamma_t(R) approximately [barSigma(<R)-Sigma(R)]/Sigma_crit\), and the evidence statement The DES Y3 paper is the cited source; the package uses only its published parameter summaries and a clearly synthetic geometry illustration, not shear catalogs or correlation-function vectors.

Boundary or common confusion: S8= sigma8 sqrt(Omega_m/0.3) compresses a degeneracy direction; it is not a direct measurement of sigma8 alone.

Slide 1 · 8 min

From ellipticity to shear

Separate intrinsic galaxy shape, point-spread function, and lensing-induced coherent distortion.

Slide 2 · 10 min

Geometry and critical density

Derive the lens-source distance factor and identify foreground/background ordering.

Slide 3 · 12 min

Three two-point functions

Map cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering to their shared parameters and distinct systematics.

Slide 4 · 12 min

DES Y3 constraints

Report S8 and Omega_m with asymmetric uncertainties and the flat-LCDM analysis label.

Slide 5 · 10 min

The S8 combination

Show how sigma8 and Omega_m trade off along a posterior ridge; avoid treating the compressed value as independent.

Slide 6 · 8 min

Systematics inventory

Discuss shear calibration, photo-z, intrinsic alignments, baryonic feedback, and survey masks.

Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cosmic ShearThe DES Y3 paper is the cited source; the package uses only its published parameter summaries and a clearly synthetic geometry illustration, not shear catalogs or correlation-function vectors.DES 3x2pt observable blocksshear x shearautog-g lensingcrossclusteringcrossg-g lensingcrosslens x sourceautoclusteringcrossclusteringcrossclusteringcrossgalaxy pairsautoConceptual correlation-function matrix; no DES shear vectors are included
The DES Y3 paper is the cited source; the package uses only its published parameter summaries and a clearly synthetic geometry illustration, not shear catalogs or correlation-function vectors.

Quantitative anchor

DES Y3 reports S8=0.776 +/- 0.017 and Omega_m=0.339(+0.032,-0.031) under its stated 3x2pt flat-LCDM analysis.

\[gamma_t(R) approximately [barSigma(<R)-Sigma(R)]/Sigma_crit\]

Interpretation and limits

Lensing shear is a coherent distortion sourced by projected gravitational potential. A 3x2pt analysis combines cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and clustering, while source redshift distributions, intrinsic alignments, and calibration enter the inference.

Boundary: S8= sigma8 sqrt(Omega_m/0.3) compresses a degeneracy direction; it is not a direct measurement of sigma8 alone.

Evidence: The DES Y3 paper is the cited source; the package uses only its published parameter summaries and a clearly synthetic geometry illustration, not shear catalogs or correlation-function vectors.

Active check: Discuss shear calibration, photo-z, intrinsic alignments, baryonic feedback, and survey masks.

ASTR 476 · Lecture 07 · 60-minute module · Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cosmic Shear