Lecture 09: Likelihoods, Priors, and Parameter Degeneracies

ASTR 476: Observational Cosmology · 2026-09-27

Driving question: What does a confidence contour really encode?

Learning objectives

  1. Write a likelihood for correlated Gaussian residuals and identify nuisance parameters.
  2. Distinguish likelihood, prior, posterior, and marginalized constraint.
  3. Explain why independent-looking published summaries may still be statistically dependent.
Terms · 8 min

Terms for This Lecture

Likelihood

Definition: The probability model for the observed data conditional on parameters and nuisance assumptions.

Why it matters here: It is required to answer What does a confidence contour really encode? and to distinguish direct observation from cosmological inference.

Relationships: Read it with Prior, the model \(p(theta|d) proportional to L(d|theta) p(theta)\), and the evidence statement Planck, Pantheon+, BOSS, and DES summary results use different data vectors, nuisance models, and parameter spaces. Their error bars cannot simply be combined as independent Gaussians.

Boundary or common confusion: A plotted ellipse in the lecture is a synthetic Gaussian geometry demonstration, not a digitized published posterior contour.

Slide 1 · 8 min

Start with a generative model

Specify latent cosmology, nuisance parameters, measurement process, and selection before writing a likelihood.

Slide 2 · 10 min

Correlated Gaussian likelihood

Derive the quadratic form and determinant term; clarify when a constant can be dropped.

Slide 3 · 12 min

Contours are projections

Show how nuisance marginalization or profiling changes a 2D contour.

Slide 4 · 12 min

Degeneracy geometry

Read a rotated ellipse and identify which linear combination is constrained tightly.

Slide 5 · 10 min

Summary tables are not a joint likelihood

List missing covariance and shared calibration terms across probes.

Slide 6 · 8 min

Reproducible inference

Record parameterization, priors, covariance, sampler diagnostics, and posterior predictive checks.

Likelihoods, Priors, and Parameter DegeneraciesPlanck, Pantheon+, BOSS, and DES summary results use different data vectors, nuisance models, and parameter spaces. Their error bars cannot simply be combined as independent Gaussians.parameter theta_1parameter theta_2degenerate directionSynthetic Gaussian contour geometry, not a published parameter posterior
Planck, Pantheon+, BOSS, and DES summary results use different data vectors, nuisance models, and parameter spaces. Their error bars cannot simply be combined as independent Gaussians.

Quantitative anchor

A Gaussian covariance likelihood is r^T C^-1 r; factorization plus linear solves avoids explicitly constructing C^-1.

\[p(theta|d) proportional to L(d|theta) p(theta)\]

Interpretation and limits

Inference begins with a data model, a likelihood, and explicit nuisance parameters. Parameter degeneracies are geometric directions in the likelihood or posterior; priors and parameterization can change marginal summaries.

Boundary: A plotted ellipse in the lecture is a synthetic Gaussian geometry demonstration, not a digitized published posterior contour.

Evidence: Planck, Pantheon+, BOSS, and DES summary results use different data vectors, nuisance models, and parameter spaces. Their error bars cannot simply be combined as independent Gaussians.

Active check: Record parameterization, priors, covariance, sampler diagnostics, and posterior predictive checks.

ASTR 476 · Lecture 09 · 60-minute module · Likelihoods, Priors, and Parameter Degeneracies