Lecture 11: Cross-Probe Concordance and Tension

ASTR 476: Observational Cosmology · 2026-09-27

Driving question: When do two experiments disagree?

Learning objectives

  1. Define a parameter-level comparison with common conventions.
  2. Identify shared-data and shared-calibration covariance pathways.
  3. Write a defensible checklist before assigning a numerical tension significance.
Terms · 8 min

Terms for This Lecture

Concordance

Definition: Consistency of multiple probes within a shared model and correctly represented covariance.

Why it matters here: It is required to answer When do two experiments disagree? and to distinguish direct observation from cosmological inference.

Relationships: Read it with Tension, the model \(Delta theta = theta_A - theta_B; significance requires Cov(theta_A,theta_B)\), and the evidence statement All comparison points are literature summaries and are tagged to their exact analysis assumptions in the dataset table and reference log.

Boundary or common confusion: Do not calculate a 'sigma tension' by adding published errors in quadrature unless independence and comparable posterior shapes are defensible.

Slide 1 · 8 min

Same symbol, different analysis

Compare parameter definitions, data cuts, and model assumptions before comparing central values.

Slide 2 · 10 min

A difference is not yet a tension

Derive the covariance of a difference and identify the independence assumption in quadrature error addition.

Slide 3 · 12 min

Shared calibration pathways

Trace how a distance ladder, photometric calibration, or common simulations can correlate nominal probes.

Slide 4 · 12 min

Evidence matrix

Sort each included result by observable, dataset, model, and covariance availability.

Slide 5 · 10 min

Avoid false synthesis

Explain why this course does not merge the summary table into a posterior.

Slide 6 · 8 min

A reproducible comparison

Specify the metadata required before a joint analysis can be run.

Cross-Probe Concordance and TensionAll comparison points are literature summaries and are tagged to their exact analysis assumptions in the dataset table and reference log.Evidence compatibility before synthesisCMBearly-universe calibrationBAOruler-scaled geometrySNerelative distancesLensingprojected mattershared priors + covarianceConcept map only; dashed edges mark information links, not a joint likelihood
All comparison points are literature summaries and are tagged to their exact analysis assumptions in the dataset table and reference log.

Quantitative anchor

Probe summaries in the package are not combined because the underlying likelihoods and cross-probe covariance are not included.

\[Delta theta = theta_A - theta_B; significance requires Cov(theta_A,theta_B)\]

Interpretation and limits

A tension claim requires harmonized parameter definitions, assumptions, and uncertainty models. Shared data, calibrations, or theory priors create covariance; scalar error-bar separation is only a diagnostic under strong independence assumptions.

Boundary: Do not calculate a 'sigma tension' by adding published errors in quadrature unless independence and comparable posterior shapes are defensible.

Evidence: All comparison points are literature summaries and are tagged to their exact analysis assumptions in the dataset table and reference log.

Active check: Specify the metadata required before a joint analysis can be run.

ASTR 476 · Lecture 11 · 60-minute module · Cross-Probe Concordance and Tension