Lecture 12: Curvature and Evolving Dark Energy

ASTR 476: Observational Cosmology · 2026-09-27

Driving question: Which parts of the distance-redshift curve reveal new physics?

Learning objectives

  1. Derive the constant-w density scaling from energy conservation.
  2. Explain the curvature contribution to E(z) and transverse distance.
  3. Interpret parameter degeneracies as limitations of a particular data/model combination.
Terms · 8 min

Terms for This Lecture

Spatial curvature

Definition: The constant-curvature contribution to FLRW spatial geometry, parameterized by Omega_k.

Why it matters here: It is required to answer Which parts of the distance-redshift curve reveal new physics? and to distinguish direct observation from cosmological inference.

Relationships: Read it with Equation-of-state parameter, the model \(E^2(z)=Omega_m(1+z)^3+Omega_k(1+z)^2+Omega_DE(1+z)^{3(1+w)}\), and the evidence statement Pantheon+ and DES published w summaries are listed with their exact analysis labels; they are not combined here.

Boundary or common confusion: A constant-w extension is not a generic reconstruction of dark energy; priors, curvature, neutrinos, and early-time assumptions matter.

Slide 1 · 8 min

Conservation gives the scaling law

Use d rho + 3H(rho+p)=0 to derive rho_DE proportional to a^-3(1+w).

Slide 2 · 10 min

Curvature enters twice

Distinguish the Omega_k term in H(z) from the sinh/sin mapping for transverse comoving distance.

Slide 3 · 12 min

Distance curves overlap

Compare w=-1 with nearby values and identify the redshift range that carries leverage.

Slide 4 · 12 min

Published extension summaries

Read Pantheon+ and DES w summaries with analysis labels and asymmetric bounds.

Slide 5 · 10 min

Model space is a choice

Discuss constant w, w0-wa, curvature, neutrinos, and prior volume without claiming equivalence.

Slide 6 · 8 min

Propose a discriminating observation

Choose a redshift-sensitive probe and state the nuisance control needed to distinguish the curves.

Curvature and Evolving Dark EnergyPantheon+ and DES published w summaries are listed with their exact analysis labels; they are not combined here.redshift zrelative dark-energy densityw=-1.1w=-1.0w=-0.9Illustrative constant-w density scaling at fixed present density; not a fit
Pantheon+ and DES published w summaries are listed with their exact analysis labels; they are not combined here.

Quantitative anchor

For constant w, rho_DE(z)/rho_DE(0)=(1+z)^(3(1+w)); the plotted curves hold all other assumptions fixed.

\[E^2(z)=Omega_m(1+z)^3+Omega_k(1+z)^2+Omega_DE(1+z)^{3(1+w)}\]

Interpretation and limits

Curvature changes the mapping from radial to transverse distance, while a constant-w model changes dark-energy density evolution. Multiple redshift ranges and calibrated rulers help break geometric degeneracies.

Boundary: A constant-w extension is not a generic reconstruction of dark energy; priors, curvature, neutrinos, and early-time assumptions matter.

Evidence: Pantheon+ and DES published w summaries are listed with their exact analysis labels; they are not combined here.

Active check: Choose a redshift-sensitive probe and state the nuisance control needed to distinguish the curves.

ASTR 476 · Lecture 12 · 60-minute module · Curvature and Evolving Dark Energy